Author Topic: Canadian Veterans National day to Rally / Protest, 11oo, 6 Nov.2010  (Read 3517 times)

Offline Mike Blais

  • SSM-Nato UNCYP PKM CD
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,571
  • SSF-Nato,CPSM,UNCYP,CD
Re: Canadian Veterans National day to Rally / Protest, 11oo, 6 Nov.2010
« Reply #15 on: November 04, 2010, 05:44:37 PM »

Veterans to rally over benefit concerns



By Chris Bush - Nanaimo News Bulletin
Published: November 04, 2010 8:00 AM
Updated: November 04, 2010 12:14 PM

Military veterans up in arms about the New Veterans Charter plan to stage a rally in front of Nanaimo-Alberni MP James Lunney’s office this weekend.

The Nanaimo event is part of a day of rallies planned across Canada Saturday (Nov. 6) protesting the New Veterans Charter.

“What we really hope to accomplish is to show Ottawa that Canadians care about their veterans,” said Ken Young, rally organizer. “It’s more of an issue than they think. It’s not just a couple of people complaining. There’s a whole lot of people who don’t like what has been done especially with the New Veterans Charter.”

The primary issue with the charter, enacted in 2006, is that it compensates soldiers disabled by injuries with a one-time lump sum disability award.

The Pension Act it replaced paid disabled veterans a tax-free pension for life, which Young said was better for individuals over the course of their lives.

Young, a Canadian army veteran who served from 1965 to 1977, suffers the effects the defoliant Agent Orange, to which he was exposed during a training operation.

He said under the New Veterans Charter, payments are made based on 75 per cent of an individual’s final salary, but that is inequitable because a private who earns far less than a captain would receive far less compensation for a lost limb than a captain losing the same limb.

“It’s the same thing as ICBC giving you $20,000 for losing a leg, but giving me $250,000 for the same injury,” Young said. “Pain and suffering, whether you’re an officer or a private, should be the same.”

In effect, Veterans Affairs Canada is now acting like an insurance company by try to lower its costs, he said.

Everyone attending the rally Saturday (Nov. 6) is asked to wear red shirts, bring Canadian flags and show support for Canada’s military veterans injured while serving and for Canada’s soldiers and RCMP personnel currently serving around the world.

He has no idea how many people will turn out Saturday, but said he has had calls from veterans across central Vancouver Island interested in attending.

“I don’t think there’ll be less than 20 and there may be as many as 200 – I don’t know,” he said.

For more information about the rally, please call Young at 250-753-8837.
1977-1RCR   Italy PL, B Coy, Mortars
                    Pioneers, Delta Coy
                    CFB London

1979-3RCR   M Coy 12C,  Sigs, Pipes&Drums
                    Mortars
                    CFB Baden WG

1982 1RCR   Mortars 51B, Dukes, BBC (Cyp)
                    Mortars, WO-Sgts Mess,
                    CFB London

2008             President. Niagara Branch
                    The Royal Canadian Regiment
                                  Association

Offline Mike Blais

  • SSM-Nato UNCYP PKM CD
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,571
  • SSF-Nato,CPSM,UNCYP,CD
Re: Canadian Veterans National day to Rally / Protest, 11oo, 6 Nov.2010
« Reply #16 on: November 04, 2010, 05:46:50 PM »
Matt Gurney: Veterans let down equally by Conservatives and Liberals


Matt Gurney  November 4, 2010 – 8:43 am

Captain Krzysztof Stachura, Canadian Forces Combat Camera/ DND

A Canadian forces engineer patrols a grape field in Kandahar province.

After years of turning the Canadian Forces into a shell of a combat force, trotting them out a handful of peacekeepers at a time to ingratiate themselves to the international community, the Liberals don’t have a lot of credibility on matters relating to national defence. During his tenure as prime minister, Paul Martin made some small effort to begin to reverse the damage his party had done to the military, but as evidenced by Michael Ignatieff’s eagerness to scrap the worthy F-35 purchase to score a few political points, it’s clear that to the Liberal party, the Canadian Armed Forces are an abstract political issue without any real inherent value or worth, to be used and abused as needed to meet other, more pressing policy goals.

The Conservatives have done better. Not as well as they should have, but they have given the military better tools and far more respect. But when it comes to how both parties treat veterans, particularly wounded soldiers, both major parties should be embarrassed. The attempts by both Liberals and Conservatives to pin the mess that is Veterans Affairs on each other are embarrassing. They need to stop.

The problems stem from 2006, when the New Veteran’s Charter (NVC) was instituted by the federal government. Among the charter’s many changes was a move away from life-time support for wounded veterans in favour of an upfront lump-sum payment instead of a continuing pension. There were obvious problems with this approach from the beginning — $250,000, the maximum possible, isn’t a lot to offer a soldier left permanently disabled. Further, someone suffering from PTSD, and possibly related substance abuse and impulse control issues, shouldn’t be given a lump sum and a pat on the back before being told that the government’s responsibility  is at an end. Don’t spend it all in one place, soldier.

It gets worse. Take the case of Dennis Manuge. After breaking his back in an accident while on duty, he was discharged and given long-term disability, but found that his veterans’ pension was being deducted from his disability payments, despite there being no connection between the two programs. (No other government employee has their pension deducted from disability payments). Or consider Sean Bruyea, a veteran whose confidential medical files were circulated freely amongst government officials and bureaucrats, in complete violation of Bruyea’s right to privacy, after he was publicly critical of  Veterans Affairs and the NVC. There are many more stories like those of Manuge and Bruyea, ranging from poor service to outright abuses of political power.

Veterans Affairs is, put bluntly, a disaster. And how has the government responded to this crisis? They’re blaming the Liberals, of course.

    “This new charter was adopted under the Liberal government’s rein and not ours,” [Veterans Affairs Minister Jean-Pierre Blackburn] told the House of Commons. “I don’t know what they meant to do, whether they meant to save at the expense of our veterans, but that is not our intention.”

Not so fast there, champ.

Yes, it’s true that the Liberals originally introduced the NVC. But the Conservatives voted for it in the House and Senate in a deal with their Liberal counterparts struck by Stephen Harper and Paul Martin to salvage the plan, which had been threatened by the instability of a minority parliament. So nice try, Mr. Blackburn, but passing the buck on something that your party supported in both chambers, as part of a deal with the Liberals, doesn’t fly. And that was four years ago. If it’s as big a Liberal-caused disaster as the Tories would have us believe, exactly how much longer did they expect veterans to wait until they got around to fixing it?

The NVC was intended to modernize a system that was deemed obsolete, a relic of the world wars. But it has failed to serve the needs of our veterans, and has become a political liability and public relations nightmare for a government keen to show off how much it loves the military. It would be nice if the Liberals and Conservatives could unite on this issue, admit that well-intentioned mistakes were made and immediately agree to reform Veterans Affairs. Instead, they’d rather play the blame game, leaving veterans out in the cold rather than risk a damaging sound bite. This coming Remembrance Day, both parties should recommit themselves to serving some of our finest citizens. The disgrace of the last four four years has gone on long enough.

National Post
mgurney@nationalpost.com


Read more: http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2010/11/04/matt-gurney-veterans-let-down-equally-by-conservatives-and-liberals/#ixzz14LvaVjhp
1977-1RCR   Italy PL, B Coy, Mortars
                    Pioneers, Delta Coy
                    CFB London

1979-3RCR   M Coy 12C,  Sigs, Pipes&Drums
                    Mortars
                    CFB Baden WG

1982 1RCR   Mortars 51B, Dukes, BBC (Cyp)
                    Mortars, WO-Sgts Mess,
                    CFB London

2008             President. Niagara Branch
                    The Royal Canadian Regiment
                                  Association

Offline BobCampbell

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
  • Fort York - 1966
Re: Canadian Veterans National day to Rally / Protest, 11oo, 6 Nov.2010
« Reply #17 on: November 05, 2010, 03:25:52 PM »
Mike,

Regarding your observations on the lump sum award I would like to make the following comments; first though let me state I’m with the Vets on all the issues regarding their treatment at the hands of VAC, I’ll be at the Grand Parade in Halifax at 11:00 Sat 6 Nov 2010 to show my support.

The lump sum payment in the amounts currently being awarded is scandalous.

I am a licensed life insurance agent in the province of Nova Scotia. One of the products I sell is annuities (i.e. private pensions).  In order for a 25 year old male with spouse (approximately same age) to receive a guaranteed $3000 payment a month for life (with a 70% survivor benefit), a lump sum of $909,000 would be required, not $276,000.  A lump sum of $276,000 at the best current annuity rate would provide a monthly payment of $905.  However, it is still a long way short of $3000. I’m not quite sure where the number $380 a month comes from; it looks like it was derived by dividing the lump sum of $270,000 by the life expectancy of 60 years (720 months).  This would be an unlikely case.

Another way to look at this issue is that in order to get a $3000 a month payment from a lump sum payment of $276,000 you would need an investment return of 15% annual every year!  Based on the economic events of the last couple of years how many think that is possible?

Assuming the injured Vet had the foresight to invest the lump sum award in a safe investment vehicle such as an annuity the payout would come up woefully short, $2100 a month.

Regards,
Bob Campbell

Offline Mike Blais

  • SSM-Nato UNCYP PKM CD
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,571
  • SSF-Nato,CPSM,UNCYP,CD
Re: Canadian Veterans National day to Rally / Protest, 11oo, 6 Nov.2010
« Reply #18 on: December 02, 2010, 03:15:33 PM »
Check out the RCRs! Or look for yourself. Just click on the video link, there are several reports from across country.

Pro Patria.

http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/TopStories/20101105/veterans-protest-compensation-101106/
1977-1RCR   Italy PL, B Coy, Mortars
                    Pioneers, Delta Coy
                    CFB London

1979-3RCR   M Coy 12C,  Sigs, Pipes&Drums
                    Mortars
                    CFB Baden WG

1982 1RCR   Mortars 51B, Dukes, BBC (Cyp)
                    Mortars, WO-Sgts Mess,
                    CFB London

2008             President. Niagara Branch
                    The Royal Canadian Regiment
                                  Association

Offline bjmaclean

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 66
Re: Canadian Veterans National day to Rally / Protest, 11oo, 6 Nov.2010
« Reply #19 on: December 04, 2010, 06:54:30 PM »
Mike. You never cease to amaze me, your devotion to the Regiment and Veterans is second to none. You have stood tall and made yourself heard. I am proud to call you a friend.
Keep up the incredable work you do.
From my heart, that of a Veteran and Royal, Thanks and Pro Patria
BJ MacLean<br />Loyal Royal since 1971

Offline Mike Blais

  • SSM-Nato UNCYP PKM CD
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,571
  • SSF-Nato,CPSM,UNCYP,CD
Re: Canadian Veterans National day to Rally / Protest, 11oo, 6 Nov.2010
« Reply #20 on: December 11, 2010, 09:33:24 AM »
BJ

Thanks brother.

I appreciate your support.

Mike
1977-1RCR   Italy PL, B Coy, Mortars
                    Pioneers, Delta Coy
                    CFB London

1979-3RCR   M Coy 12C,  Sigs, Pipes&Drums
                    Mortars
                    CFB Baden WG

1982 1RCR   Mortars 51B, Dukes, BBC (Cyp)
                    Mortars, WO-Sgts Mess,
                    CFB London

2008             President. Niagara Branch
                    The Royal Canadian Regiment
                                  Association